Skip to content
MarketHQ

For developer-tool companies.

Market intelligence for developer tools — get recommended by AI.

Developers ask ChatGPT what to use. Agents vet your docs before they buy. MarketHQ shows you every conversation, every list that feeds the answers, and exactly what to fix — so your agents can bring in the money.

Free plan, no card. We check the developer communities for you through the day — every hour on a paid plan.

How a mention becomes revenue.

A mention is a chance to start a conversation. Winning it is how the next buyer finds you.

Posted 9:00am → in your feed within the hour. Your top opportunities land in Slack each morning.

  1. 1

    Hear it

    Public mentions found within the hour, not days.

  2. 2

    Find winning points

    Your real strengths, pulled into points you can actually use.

  3. 3

    Answer it

    Answered from your strengths. You write it — or start from a drafted reply that leads with them.

  4. 4

    Win the conversation

    The reply people point to when they compare you.

  5. 5

    Make revenue

    More recommendations. More pipeline. The loop closes.

Where those mentions come from.

Public mentions of you and your competitors, from the places developers actually look.

Developer communities

The forums where a tool actually gets picked.

Hacker NewsStack OverflowGitHubDev.toLobstersProduct Hunt

The rest of the web

News, blogs, docs, changelogs. Add any URL with a feed or page.

News & blogsDocs & changelogsCustom URLs

AI answers

We ask the way developers ask, weekly, and record who gets named.

ClaudeChatGPTGeminiPerplexityGrokDeepSeek

Social

Comparisons, complaints, and what people are switching to.

LinkedInXRedditYouTubeBlueskyQuora

Mentions

Someone mentioned you an hour ago. Did you see it?

Every mention of you and your competitors — classified, sentiment-scored, evidence attached.

Example workspace · fictional competitor “Ferrix”

r/devops · 2hnegative · Ferrix⚑ revenue

Is there a cheaper alternative to Ferrix? Pricing jumped again.

This is the kind of thread the product flags first — active buying intent, a named competitor, negative sentiment.

HN comment · 5h

We tried both — their webhook debugging story is genuinely better.

positive · you

issue · 9h

Docs don't cover self-hosted setup behind a proxy. Stuck for a day.

negative · you

post · 1d

Comparing observability tools for our platform team this quarter…

evaluation

AI visibility

When developers ask AI what to use — are you the answer?

Every week we ask six AIs your market's questions and track who gets recommended and how that's trending. We keep the raw answers as evidence, so you can see exactly who was named and go win the sources.

ClaudeChatGPTGeminiPerplexityGrokDeepSeek

22%

you

vs.

41%

leading competitor

That's the gap this section exists to close — and the read your action plan starts from.

Recommendation share

Sampled AI answers in this example workspace

Ferrix41%
You22%
Not mentioned37%

Visibility trend

Recommendation share, last 6 months

MarAprMayJunJulAug
YouFerrix

Cited sources

What AI answers cite when your category comes up — each one a place you can go influence

Official documentation86
Reddit · r/devtools71
Stack Overflow answers64
Independent comparison posts52
GitHub README & issues47

Where AI answers come from

Three out of four AI “best tool” answers come from listicles.

When someone asks an AI assistant for the best tool in your category, the answer is stitched together from a handful of “best X” lists — industry studies of AI citations put it at roughly three in four answers — and one top-3 spot carries most of a keyword's value. MarketHQ traces which lists feed the answers about your category, shows where you're missing, and hands you the pitch list.

Example workspace · fictional pages

#2

10 Best Webhook Debugging Tools in 2026

The Stack Review

You're listed
#1

Top 7 Webhook Debugging Platforms for Teams

devpicks.io

Not listed
#3

Webhook Debugging Tools, Compared

Hookline Weekly

Cited by AI · ChatGPT, Perplexity
#5

Best Ferrix Alternatives for Event Tooling

The Stack Review

Not listed

→ pitch drafted into your action plan

Competitors

Their pricing page changed this afternoon. You heard within the hour.

Pricing, changelogs, docs — we watch the pages you name and check them through the day. Every meaningful change arrives as a plain-English summary in your feed, not a surprise in your next deal.

  1. 2:05pm

    ferrix.dev/pricing

    Pro plan raised $39 → $49/mo. Annual discount removed.

    Their upmarket move is your window with price-sensitive teams.

  2. Tue

    ferrix.dev/changelog

    Shipped SSO on the Pro tier.

    SSO objection is gone — your battle card updated automatically.

  3. last week

    ferrix.dev/docs

    New migration guide targeting your customers.

    They're courting your users. Time for a counter-page.

Search & SEO · coming soon

Own the three spots that matter on every keyword.

A top-3 spot on the right page earns more clicks than positions 4–10 combined. We're building this: which pages hold those spots for your category, which of them AI engines cite, and what to publish to take the traffic. It isn't in the product yet and isn't part of any plan — the panel below is an illustration of where it's going.

Illustrative example · not live yet

webhook debugging

2.9k/mo

searches/mo

#2

their rank

your rank

An estimated ~1.2k visits/mo going to their post instead of yours. 34 domains link to it, including two newsletters that cover your category.

→ drafted into your action plan

event replay tool

You #8 · Them #3 · 1.4k/mo

ferrix alternative

You #5 · Them n/a · 880/mo

Gap analysis → action plan

See where you're losing. Know what to fix.

Eleven dimensions of your market position, scored against the field — with the evidence behind each score a click away as coverage grows — then each gap becomes a ranked action with the result it should move.

Worst first

YouField average
  • Community Share of Voice
    19%
  • AI Visibility
    22%
  • Evaluation Presence
    24%
  • Content Coverage
    31%
  • Authority Footprint
    36%
  • Switching Momentum
    38%
  • Problem Presence
    44%
  • Search Presence
    46%
  • Social Presence
    52%
  • Sentiment Balance
    58%
  • Momentum
    61%

Low AI recommendation share vs. Ferrix

High

Evidence: 22% recommendation share vs. Ferrix's 41% across sampled AI answers this month.

Why it matters: AI assistants are an increasingly common first stop for tool evaluation. Low share means fewer developers ever see you as an option.

Publish comparison and architecture content AI systems can cite.

Setup friction driving switch decisions

High

Evidence: 9-step manual setup vs. a 2-step CLI install, cited across 14 threads.

Why it matters: Developers repeatedly cite setup complexity as a reason for choosing a competitor during evaluation.

Ship a guided CLI install and cut required steps to 3 or fewer.

Documentation sentiment trending down

Medium

Evidence: Sentiment on self-hosted docs fell 12 points over the last quarter.

Why it matters: Negative documentation sentiment correlates with higher support load and lower activation.

Add a self-hosted quickstart and a troubleshooting FAQ.

The mention. The gap. What to say.

A mention stream, AI recommendation share, the next action, and a drafted reply that uses your strengths. Example workspace. Fictional competitor “Ferrix.”

MentionAI visibilityGapReply

Example workspace

Product UI · fictional competitor “Ferrix”

  • Reddit — r/devtools2d agoPositivePraising

    Been using it for three months now — the CLI is genuinely fast, no complaints.

  • github4d agoNegativeFrustrated

    Error messages on failed builds don't say which step failed. Had to add my own logging to find it.

  • youtube6d agoNeutralEvaluating

    Walkthrough comparing setup time between the two — worth watching before you pick a tool.

  • stackoverflow8d agoPositivePraising

    Answered my question fast and the docs link actually worked, unlike some tools.

Chat-first

Ask your market anything.

No dashboards to learn. Ask a question in plain language and get an evidence-backed answer.

Market Chat
Find high-intent conversations.

One thread stands out: a developer moved their whole stack to Ferrix specifically because of the one-command install — active, recent, and unanswered.1

A second: a GitHub issue thread where a team is visibly blocked on setup and comparing alternatives in the comments.2

YouFerrix
Evaluation presence24% 49%
Problem presence44% 51%
Switching momentum38% 47%
Recommended actions
  • HighPublish comparison and architecture content AI systems can cite.
  • MediumAdd a self-hosted quickstart and a troubleshooting FAQ.
  • HighShip a guided CLI install and cut required steps to 3 or fewer.
View action plan

Chat when you want answers. Connect when you want it in the workflow.

Ask the market a question in chat. Or pull the same intelligence through the API and our MCP server so your own agents can query it — with a daily Slack digest of what matters.

mcp query · illustrative
$ market.query({
  "intent": "gap_analysis",
  "compare": ["you", "ferrix"]
})

→ 3 gaps, ranked by impact
→ evidence attached, 2 sources

Chat

“Why are developers choosing our competitor this week?”

API & MCP

Structured mentions, gaps, and actions into the tools you already run — so your own agents can pick up the next revenue move without you.

The new funnel stage

AI agents check you out before their humans ever do.

Before an agent recommends — or buys — a tool, it reads the docs, checks the listings, looks for an API and an MCP server, and decides whether you're legitimate. That's a funnel stage you can't see in analytics. Today MarketHQ tracks the lists AI engines cite and tells you where you're missing from them; the rest of the agent's checklist is what we're building next.

Tracked today

  • Listed on the lists AIs cite

Coming next

  • Docs readable
  • API + MCP server found
  • Claims match evidence

Pricing

One product. Paid tiers differ by tracking capacity, not features.

Free covers the developer communities. Every paid plan gets the same full product — chat, gap analysis, action plans, AI visibility — and the volume caps grow as you do.

Free

$0
Start free
  • 2 competitors tracked
  • 3 keywords tracked
  • Up to 1,000 mentions/mo
  • Community lanes — Hacker News, GitHub, Stack Overflow, RSS, Dev.to, Lobsters
  • Checked a few times a day
  • Plus a one-off Bluesky sweep when you sign up
  • Chat over your own collected evidence

Lite

$29/mo
Choose Lite

Start 7-day trial for $0.99, then $29/mo. Cancel anytime.

  • Everything in Free, plus:
  • 3 competitors tracked
  • 10 keywords tracked
  • 10 AI-visibility questions, checked weekly across 6 AI engines
  • Up to 3,000 mentions/mo — adds Reddit, X, LinkedIn, YouTube, blogs & news
  • Checked every hour
  • 5 drafted replies/mo
  • Gap analysis + action plan
Most popular

Startup

$99/mo
Choose Startup

Start 7-day trial for $0.99, then $99/mo. Cancel anytime.

  • Everything in Lite, plus:
  • 5 competitors tracked
  • 30 keywords tracked
  • 60 AI-visibility questions, checked weekly across 6 AI engines
  • Up to 12,000 mentions/mo
  • 10 drafted replies/mo

Growth

$199/mo
Choose Growth

Start 7-day trial for $0.99, then $199/mo. Cancel anytime.

  • Everything in Startup, plus:
  • 20 competitors tracked
  • 100 keywords tracked
  • 120 AI-visibility questions, checked weekly across 6 AI engines
  • Up to 25,000 mentions/mo
  • 50 drafted replies/mo

Enterprise — from $499/mo: custom competitor, keyword, question and mention caps, and an invoice instead of a card. Same product, sized to your team.

Talk to us

Volume caps are ceilings, not quotas — most workspaces use a fraction.

Let your agents bring in the money.

Connect your domain and see what developers are already saying about you. The free plan keeps watching the developer communities for you through the day; paid plans check every hour. Upgrade when it earns it.